[dlphilp_AT_bright.net: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Tracker vs. sequencer]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [dlphilp_AT_bright.net: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Tracker vs. sequencer]
From: reactor/CTPmedia (reactor_AT_sagv5.gyakg.u-szeged.hu)
Date: ma elo    30 1999 - 18:09:16 EDT


----- Forwarded message from Dave Phillips <dlphilp_AT_bright.net> -----

Greetings:

  Just a quick note to mention that I've added some more pieces to my
MP3 page at:

        http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/dp_mp3.html

One of the pieces (Time Wasted) was created using Michael Krause's
SoundTracker.

  Btw, SoundTracker has been consistently developed by its author and
has just reached version 0.3.1.

  IMO, a tracker is simply one kind of audio sequencer. Paul W, if
you're reading this you might want to take another look at modern
trackers. I think it's possible to do many things quite beyond the
original design basis, although the design biases are indeed apparent.
Trackers really are great for many sorts of dance music, and with
variable track length per pattern I think there are some rather
interesting rhythmic possibilities.

== Dave Phillips

       http://www.bright.net/~dlphilp/index.html
   http://sunsite.univie.ac.at/Linux-soundapp/linux_soundapps.html

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 

Máté Rácz a.k.a. reactor - http://linux.gyakg.u-szeged.hu/~reactor/ CTP media - since 1995 - http://ctpmedia.scene.hu/


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : pe maalis 10 2000 - 07:25:53 EST