Subject: HZ > 100 overhead
From: est_AT_hyperreal.org
Date: ke loka 27 1999 - 13:42:56 EDT
Paul Barton-Davis discourseth:
> >
> >Wouldn't you say that an HZ > 100 kernel is the cleanest solution?
>
> its the cleanest, but not the best. HZ = 1000 adds about 8% overhead
> to IRQ processing *all the time*.
Are you *sure* about this? I seem to remember there was some debate
about that figure on linux-kernel.
Eric
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : pe maalis 10 2000 - 07:27:59 EST