Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: 4D-NXs and Hammerfall
From: Benno Senoner (sbenno_AT_gardena.net)
Date: to loka 28 1999 - 21:37:36 EDT
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Benjamin GOLINVAUX wrote:
> Well.. Matt Gonzalez from Echo is an open minded guy who responded
> quite positively to me a few months ago about a BeOS driver request,
> so positively that, at the moment, I'm torn between the RME Hammerfall
> for Linux and the Layla for BeOS...
>
> He's been shown his hardware could shine on BeOS (it does) and,
> well, now, Steinberg will be showing Nuendo with a Layla on BeOS
> (actually they've been demonstrating it only under STUDI/O, but the
> peformance of the two vards are **roughly** the same under BeOS)
>
> I wonder what Matt Gonzalez would feel like after a "latency chat" with Benno
> and Paul.
>
Benjamin,
what was the 7ms io-latency on BeOS using Layla / STUD/O ?
pure audio buffers , or external measured REAL latency,
which includes DAC/ADC/filters delays ?
But anyway: send him the the link to the lowlatency page, and say him
that he should write us his opinionus on this topic.
I asked an optinion about the Linux realtime performance to
one of Seersystems Reality engineers on music-dsp ,
let's see what he answers.
:-)
PS: he said tuning the low latency on Windows (with special kernel drivers and
other hacks) took an additional 50-100% of amount of work.
(which could be invested in doing real DSP stuff, but yes, Seer achieves
the best performance compared to other softsynths)
Benno.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : pe maalis 10 2000 - 07:28:00 EST