Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] interesting 2.3.4* kernel statistic
From: Benno Senoner (sbenno_AT_gardena.net)
Date: ti helmi 22 2000 - 18:00:33 EST
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Roger Larsson wrote:
and a close() call is issued zillions of time during my tests.
> >
> > Therefore I don't understand how/if the lockmetering can be applied to do any
> > inferency on how small latencies we can get out of our realtime apps.
> >
>
> a) Tested on an unpatched 2.2.x
> b) Tested on current 2.3.x. Basically unpatched too since I have not
> seen
> Ingo M. announce his 2.3 patch yet. Some things are fixed during
> development.
> I.e with the version tested your worst case will be at least 34 ms.
> Since several locks might be taken during one kernel operation.
>
> /RogerL
Did you test lockmetering on a 2.2.10-lowlatencyN6B kernel ?
I don't pretend to trigger the worst case with my system stressing benchmark,
but if the worst case would be 34ms why I am staying below the 3ms mark ?
Benno.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : pe maalis 10 2000 - 07:23:27 EST