Re: [linux-audio-dev] FS "corruption" with 2.2.13 + lowlat-2.2.13-A1.txt + latency-profiling-2.2.13-r7

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] FS "corruption" with 2.2.13 + lowlat-2.2.13-A1.txt + latency-profiling-2.2.13-r7
From: Benno Senoner (sbenno_AT_gardena.net)
Date: pe marras 19 1999 - 09:28:06 EST


On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, maarten de boer wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, roger.larsson_AT_norran.net wrote:
> > Hi all (and especially Ingo),
> >
> >
> > I recenty compiled 2.2.13 with Ingos 'lowlat' and mine
> > 'latency-profiling'.
> >
> > Since then I have had several freezes...
> >
> > This is a little strange since both 'lowlat' and 'latency-profiling'
> > works
> > well under 2.2.10.
>
> Hm. I had a lot of freezes with 2.2.10 + lowlat, and less with 2.2.13 +
> lowlat. I use a SMP machine. On neither Benno's /proc stresstest
> does not give the desired results.
>
> Maarten

On my dual Celeron box, while running the UP version of 2.2.10-lowlatency-N6,
I experienced big latency problems:
the cause was APM, which seems to freeze IRQs on my mainboard Gigabyte SMP BX
(on an UP Asus P2B APM doesn't ruin latencies)
After disabling APM the results on my celeron were ok)
I did not try with the 2.2.10-lowlatency-N6 in SMP mode, because Ingo said
that his 2.2.10 patch doesn't perform optimally on SMP since the kernel-lock
parts needs to be changes to exploit full performance.

Hmm I'm not aware of the 2.2.13-lowlat-A1 ?
Where can I get it , what is the difference between 2.2.10-N6 and this patch ?
(except that it works with kernel 2.2.13 ?)

regards,
Benno.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : pe maalis 10 2000 - 07:23:25 EST