Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] MuCoS, Glame, API Issues
From: David Olofson (david_AT_gardena.net)
Date: la maalis 11 2000 - 18:52:37 EST
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > This is a choice the host can make depending on what the current
> > processing net looks like. Plugins don't have to bother with it
> > anything more than either supporting in-place processing (most algos
> > inherently do), or saying LADSPA_PROPERTY_INPLACE_BROKEN.
>
> So a plugin that supports inplace modifying still needs to support the
> case of non inplace modifying? Err...
Not explicitly. You always have one input buffer pointer and one
output buffer pointer. If the plugin supports inplace processing, the
host may chose to use the same physical memory for both buffers. It
makes no difference to the plugin.
//David
.- M u C o S --------------------------------. .- David Olofson ------.
| A Free/Open Multimedia | | Audio Hacker |
| Plugin and Integration Standard | | Linux Advocate |
`------------> http://www.linuxdj.com/mucos -' | Open Source Advocate |
.- A u d i a l i t y ------------------------. | Singer |
| Rock Solid Low Latency Signal Processing | | Songwriter |
`---> http://www.angelfire.com/or/audiality -' `-> david_AT_linuxdj.com -'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : su maalis 12 2000 - 09:14:06 EST