Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and run_adding()

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and run_adding()
From: Kai Vehmanen (kaiv_AT_wakkanet.fi)
Date: Sat Nov 18 2000 - 16:48:27 EET

On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Paul Barton-Davis wrote:

> I have to laugh - here's the exact opposite point of view from
> vst-plugins today, about processReplacing, which is the equivalent of
[...]
> Can both points of view be right ?

:) Yup, been following the same vst-plugins thread. But seriously,
this guy is just comparing run_adding() and run_replacing() using one
use case.

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Also, in a typical polyphonic synth implementing processReplacing, the first
> voice replaces the data and additional voices pass over the same buffer
> accumulating into it. So, the performance advantage of implementing
> processReplacing is probably very small. I bothered to implement it with my
> first synths and couldn't tell the difference so haven't bothered with later
> ones.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

-- 
 . http://www.eca.cx ... [ audio software for linux ] /\ . 
 . http://www.eca.cx/aivastus ... [ aivastus net radio ] /\ . 
 . http://www.eca.cx/sculpscape [ my armchair-tunes mp3/ra/wav ]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Nov 18 2000 - 17:11:16 EET