Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: my take on the "virtual studio" (monoli th vs plugins) ... was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: my take on the "virtual studio" (monoli th vs plugins) ... was Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour, LADSPA, a marriage
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 22 2000 - 17:33:06 EET


On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:57:24PM +0100, MOULET Xavier FTRD/DMR/ISS wrote:
> buffer_2 = fft(buffer_1)
> buffer_3 = outerproduct(buffer1,transpose(buffer1))
> buffer4 = filter(buffer1,coefs_numerator,coefs_denominator)
> buffer5 = hamming(1024)

OK, you've convinced me, note that you can do most of this stuff with C +
libraries with not much more difficulty though. It would be a little more
ugly though.

I still beleive that it's only worthwhile if you loose no speed when
working with C(++). You could always create a wrapper plugin that
calls Python methods. I have it on good authority that the c<->python
interface is really good. And its not as if the performance in python
plugins is going to be that good anyway.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Nov 22 2000 - 18:51:29 EET