RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype
From: Richard W.E. Furse (richard_AT_muse.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2001 - 01:14:46 EEST

I must admit I don't really follow this - what's the point of "extending
LADSPA to do IPC"? LADSPA is intended as a way to abstract out DSP
algorithms - IPC sounds like an odd thing to bring into this. I could be
missing the point however...

The XML categorisation stuff is an interesting idea however.

--Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu
[mailto:owner-linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Richard
Guenther
Sent: 14 August 2001 16:48
To: Paul Davis
Cc: linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA Prototype

On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Paul Davis wrote:

[... dictator vs. community snipped]

Yeah :) Thats it. LADSPA is the dictator way, too - so I think
extending LADSPA to do IPC without interfering with its simple
API is more suitable to our user/developer community than doing
the same thing again. Lets have a GLAME/GStreamer like API for
the real men that want to do powerful nodes.

See my previous mail - Richard. 

--
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther_AT_uni-tuebingen.de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/
The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Aug 16 2001 - 01:18:38 EEST