Re: [linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more
From: Jussi Laako (jussi.laako_AT_kolumbus.fi)
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 21:12:34 EET

• Next message: John Lazzaro: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Introducing DMIDI"
• Previous message: Jussi Laako: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Still I cannot understand why..."
• In reply to: Alexander Ehlert: "[linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more"
• Next in thread: Steve Harris: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more"
• Reply: Jussi Laako: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more"

Alexander Ehlert wrote:
>
> That should be way faster than FFT. Using FFT your frequency bands
> are distributed linear over the frequency range. That is untypical
> for equalizers anyway, as they always use a logarithmic scale. Which
> is obvious, because musical harmonies are perceived on a logarithmic
> scale, f.i. one octave up corresponds to a doubling in frequency.

Yes, this part is the most problematic. I'm still tuning my response
generation algorithm for the FFT based eq.

Btw. CoolEdit (on Windows) uses FFT filters/eq's.

 - Jussi Laako

-- 
PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B  39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B
Available at PGP keyservers

• Next message: John Lazzaro: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Introducing DMIDI"
• Previous message: Jussi Laako: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Still I cannot understand why..."
• In reply to: Alexander Ehlert: "[linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more"
• Next in thread: Steve Harris: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more"
• Reply: Jussi Laako: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Equalizer(was Still blabla...) and more"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 20 2001 - 21:07:39 EET