Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4.0
From: David Woodhouse (dwmw2_AT_infradead.org)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 18:35:48 EET
pbd_AT_Op.Net said:
> no, thats not the logical answer at all. the logical answer is
> something like the excellent but neglected UTIME patch that
> continually reprograms the system timer so that you can get precise
> event scheduling without the insane overhead of HZ=10000.
Indeed. Which, as an added bonus, lets me nick the system timer and
reprogram it to 18KHz for the PC speaker driver :)
But that's a different story.
-- dwmw2
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jan 30 2001 - 19:44:26 EET