Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] User Interface
From: ljp (ljp_AT_llornkcor.com)
Date: Thu Jul 26 2001 - 08:05:43 EEST
At 22:04 7/25/2001 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>Paul Winkler writes:
> >> I was just wondering why people on this list seem to ignore glame, when
> >> the discussion comes upon waveeditors. [ ... ]
> >
> >Can't compile it without GNOME. I don't like that. I guess that makes me a
> >luddite. Oh well.
>
>i *am* a luddite, and i don't like GNOME-dependent audio software either.
To me, music is more important than any library ideologies. I wouldn't give
a rats ass if software was made with QBASIC, as long as it compiles fairly
easily (not alot of excessive library inclusion that I have to install
every libtom-libdick-and-libharry libs just to compile it- because there no
binaries available), functions well, and serves the purpose that I use it
for. I'm willing to check out glame. I'll let ya know what I think about it.
ljp
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jul 26 2001 - 08:08:00 EEST