[linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laaga, round 2

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laaga, round 2
From: Paul Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Tue May 08 2001 - 18:44:11 EEST


>We need an architecture that move interest of developers from to write
>an application to write a component, this is IMO a fundamental thing.
>
>Often I feel that Paul is too focused on a single
>problem/application/solution

This is certainly possible. But if its true, then I think you should
have a good explanation for why Steinberg's approach (3 different
API's for different tasks) was taken. Was it lack of time? Lack of
concern for the future? Stupidity?

When I look at other audio application environments, I see
monoliths+plugins. I this just a hangover from the lack of The Unix
Way(TM) on Windows and MacOS? Or is it based on some real
understanding of how best to go about this?

--p


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 08 2001 - 19:13:57 EEST