Re: [linux-audio-dev] OffTopic: LAD logo

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] OffTopic: LAD logo
From: Frank Neumann (Frank.Neumann_AT_st.com)
Date: Fri May 11 2001 - 14:55:38 EEST


Hi *,
Jörn wrote:

> > Could you be more specific? Geometries?
>
> well, frank, what format do you need for submission to LinuxTag ?
> (a vectorized image is possibly the optimal solution, but can gimp
> handle these ?)

There were no requirements. I guess they just want to collect what they
get so they can equip the descriptions of the open-source booths with
the corresponding logo in the magazine. We certainly have this problem
of "screen image" vs "print media" with the two having different color
spaces. But I see no way to send them color-calibrated TIFFs (we have no
Pantone, HKS or RAL color tables in the non-commercial world, I think).

Last year I helped the Debian folks prepare a CD cover image, and in the
end I just sent my image (pixel-based) to the print studio. The colors
looked a *little* different from what I had seen on my screen, but
basically I was very happy with the results.

Oh, and about resolution: That CD cover image was something like
1536x1536, printed on a ~ 13x13cm cover, and you could very hardly see
any pixels at all.
So I guess for smaller printing (the magazine won't print that large
logos, I believe) something even lower than 1000x1000 will be fine, and
there is no requirement that it has to be rectangular.

Of course, for really large-scale printing (banners) a vectorized format
might be better. My logo suggestion is entirely pixel-based at the
moment, though...

Gimp is working only pixel-based (except for e.g. the Gfig plugin), so
if you want to provide a vectorized version, you'll have to take
something like Xfig, Sketch or hand-coded PostScript. :-)
But I believe this is no problem - pixel-based images are really ok if
they are fine enough.

> as for logos, well, er, haven't really thought about it. do as you
> wish. i might ask for rescaling when i actually work it into the lad
> page, but that's not important now.
>
> for buttons, i guess common practice is 88 by 31.

Ah, good to know. I haven't yet seen any recommendations on button
sizes.
 
Frank


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri May 11 2001 - 15:14:14 EEST