Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Wed May 16 2001 - 13:25:53 EEST
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:02:49PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Not loads, probably a meg or two, but half of it will get polluted on each
> >invocation.
>
> You're going to touch 500kB plus to process 64 frames of audio data?
That should have been in *some* invocations, it probably exaplains why
you can't do low latency convolution on PC's.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed May 16 2001 - 12:49:31 EEST