Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC
From: Abramo Bagnara (abramo_AT_alsa-project.org)
Date: Wed May 16 2001 - 16:46:05 EEST
Jay Ts wrote:
>
> Abramo wrote:
> > That apart, my current conclusion is that multiprocess approach is
> > definitely interesting and we need to design an architecture that works
> > fine with both approaches. Period.
>
> Abramo, I'm wondering about something. Maybe you've told us this
> before, but if so, I've skimmed over it. Can you tell us, in 200
> words or less, why you feel that a multiprocess approach is so
> vital to support? That is, what do you want to do that would require
> it, and would not be possible with the single process (minimized/no
> IPC or context switching) approach?
200 words... far less ;-)
- performance (for SMP machine)
- greater robustness
- integration of audio applications not written as pure component
-- Abramo Bagnara mailto:abramo_AT_alsa-project.orgOpera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023 Via Emilia Interna, 140 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org It sounds good!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed May 16 2001 - 17:14:06 EEST