Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: more bad low latency results
From: Vincent Touquet (vincent_AT_ulyssis.org)
Date: Fri Nov 16 2001 - 01:02:46 EET
(cut)
>
>I think 2.4.14 or 15pre are ok, too. The same LL patch should work.
>
>Takashi
I have an Athlon too.
Is it true that there are issues with the lowlatency patches
(Andrew Morton's as well as the kernel pre-emption patches) and the optimizations
used in the kernel for the Athlon processor ?
If so, do I need to compile for i386 in order to be able to achieve low latency using these patches ?
Kind Regards
vini
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Nov 16 2001 - 00:59:38 EET