Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: more bad low latency results
From: Maarten de Boer (maarten.deboer_AT_iua.upf.es)
Date: Fri Nov 16 2001 - 11:09:45 EET
Vincent Touquet <vincent_AT_ulyssis.org> wrote:
> I have an Athlon too.
> Is it true that there are issues with the lowlatency patches
> (Andrew Morton's as well as the kernel pre-emption patches) and the
> optimizations used in the kernel for the Athlon processor ?
>
> If so, do I need to compile for i386 in order to be able to achieve
> low latency using these patches ?
My experience: yes. 386 or 586.
However Andy Lo-A-Foe got good results with CONFIG_MK7=y
In other words: I am really lost. I am getting the impression nobody
really knows what to do and what to expect with the low latency patches.
Maarten
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Nov 16 2001 - 10:58:22 EET