Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] SCHED_FIFO versus SCHED_RR
From: Paul Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:40:57 EET
>It sounds like SCHED_RR is a bit more polite. I wouldn't want a monster
>synthesis thread to hog the CPU and lock out everything else. I guess with
>Round Robin that equal priority threads at least get a chance to run. I want
>equal priority threads to timeslice with my task.
you understand that its "equal priority *and* SCHED_RR class", right?
normal SCHED_OTHER threads won't get run as long as there are any
runnable SCHED_RR or SCHED_FIFO threads ...
--p
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Nov 27 2001 - 02:38:58 EET