Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA revisited (was: LAAGA and supporting programs)
From: Richard W.E. Furse (richard_AT_muse.demon.co.uk)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2001 - 23:54:36 EEST
Oops, you're right of course - brain must have shut down.
Hopefully issues are addressed to an extent in other emails. If all else
fails, the numbered points in the recent big posting are a good start point
for debate, as is the API (if it makes sense to folk). What I find
interesting is that so far no one has actually object to the concept-level
stuff in LADMEA except to suggest that it's more than we need.
With apologies for idiocy,
--Richard
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu
> [mailto:owner-linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Karl
> MacMillan
> Sent: 02 October 2001 21:31
> To: linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu
> Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADMEA revisited (was: LAAGA and
> supporting programs)
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > [...]
> > > It is certainly true that there is only one type of
> "exchange" currently
> > > written for JACK, and that is for low-latency PCM. This does
> not mean that
> > > the API is not suitable for other types of connections,
> though. I think
> > > the beauty of the JACK API is that the clients have so few
> > > responsibilities, which actually makes it easier to provide different
> > > backends. I would certainly be interested in some specific
> cases that you
> > > think cannot be handled by the JACK api - as Paul said, now
> is a good time
> > > to talk about these issues.
> > >
> > > Karl
> > [....]
> >
> > Hmmm, LADMEA is written to be as short as possible with little/no
> > redundancy, possibly at the slight expense of performance.
> Which features do
> > you think LADMEA has that aren't necessary (other than the
> Codec spec which
> > is a bit of an appendix)?
> >
>
> I don't quite understand what you are asking from the context of my mail.
> I was not addressing LADMEA at all, but rather asking for clarification
> about the complaints that you have about JACK. So it isn't clear to me why
> you are asking what I think is unnecessary in LADMEA.
>
> Karl
>
> > --Richard
> >
>
> ---------------------
> Karl W. MacMillan
> Computer Music Department
> Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University
> karlmac_AT_peabody.jhu.edu
> mambo.peabody.jhu.edu/~karlmac
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Oct 02 2001 - 23:55:10 EEST