Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA or JACK or...(was: LADMEA revisited...)
From: Paul Davis (pbd_AT_Op.Net)
Date: Mon Oct 01 2001 - 00:02:15 EEST
>> JACK *doesn't care(know)*: its only job
>> is to *interconnect* and schedule things that need to be scheduled,
>with
>> the "when" and "how much" of scheduling being left to a "driver".
>
>that's why i think JACK should be renamed to LAIC, which stands for
>Linux Audio InterConnect
1) there's nothing Linux specific about it.
2) JACK => JACK Audio Connection Kit
3) Most people would have no idea how to say "LAIC"
4) "Think you know pro-audio on Linux? You don't know JACK!" is just
too good to pass up, even for people like myself for don't watch
TV in the USA :)
--p
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Sep 30 2001 - 23:58:37 EEST