Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] The intel C compiler
From: Jussi Laako (jussi.laako_AT_kolumbus.fi)
Date: Thu Feb 21 2002 - 22:40:37 EET
bob.colwell_AT_attbi.com wrote:
>
> Saying the code runs faster than on an "equivalent"
> Intel processor requires that we agree on what
> equivalent means, a discussion that I suspect won't
> benefit this email list. (Equivalent process
> technologies? Equivalent clock rates? Equivalent
> aggregate performance? Equivalent product intro dates?) -
I meant same clock frequency... :)
- Jussi Laako
-- PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B 39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B Available at PGP keyservers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Feb 21 2002 - 22:30:34 EET