Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ALSA vs OSS/free
From: Dan Hollis (goemon_AT_anime.net)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 02:13:05 EET
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Jussi Laako wrote:
> > and a lot of extra CPU cycles when all the high end applications use
> > non-interleaved data so that editing is easy.
> You can effectively process interleaved data with SIMD as you can
> parallelize operations for 2-4 channels.
This leaves all the other CPU out in the cold. It's a bad solution to
require a specific CPU for your application.
-Dan
-- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 11 2002 - 02:02:46 EET