Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and JACK
From: Robert Jonsson (robert.jonsson_AT_dataductus.se)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 14:59:43 EET
Hi,
I think it's not so much XML as custom widgets.
Some plugs will probably work better with specialised widgets that is perhaps
only applicable to this particular plugin.
Also there are some plugs where the GUI clearly adds clarity by using
alternative visualisation. I'm for instance thinking about some of TC's plugins
with very intuitive gui's.
They don't introduce any new parameters in the GUI's but the visualisation is
very nice (and easy on the eyes).
But that was perhaps what you where aiming for? I mean to remove these
"horrible" gui intensive plugs? ;-)
/R
Stefan Kost wrote:
> Steve Harris wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 10:28:42 +0100, Stefan Kost wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Steve,
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>>
>>>> Thats fine for v. simple things, but things that really need guis
>>>> can't be
>>>> easily described in XML, eg.
>>>> http://plugin.org.uk/releases/guis/harmonic_gui-0.2.png
>>>> http://plugin.org.uk/releases/guis/delayorama_gui-0.1.png
>>>>
>>>> Both need a fair bit of maths to make them go.
>>>>
>>>> - Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see any reason, why those gui can't be described via xml
>>
>>
>>
>> The GUI *is* described in XML, I built it in glade:
>
>
> <puzzled>
> why do you then say that "...things that really need guis can't be
> easily described in XML..." ?
> </puzzled>
>
> Stefan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Mar 15 2002 - 14:47:37 EET
