Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] changing control port values with LADSPA: a serious issue?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 27 2002 - 11:35:10 EET
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:57:38 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> >If we're going to change ladspa to add better parameter control, then
> >timestamped events seems like a better approach. How you represent this is
> >probably not important.
>
> i see the point. however i guess that right now the issue does not
> have enough momentum to trigger a change of ladspa.h, and all that
> #includes it. it may not be important how this is implemented, but i
> think it might prove tricky if it is still to be called simple;
> and ceterum censeo that such a system should be made able to transport
> musical data, too.
That would be good, but personaly I think both of these are too complex to
go in LADSPA (not anytime soon anyway).
If LADSPA evolves into something mroe complex thats OK I guess, but it
would be nice to keep something simple for newbie plugin authors to
learn on.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 27 2002 - 11:24:19 EET