Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Specs ?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 17:35:45 EEST
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:23:11 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> I'd prefer "VST". There are dozens of useful plugins, hundreds of
> developers with some knowledge of it, and demonstrated functionality
> (albeit with some of the same problems as LADSPA, but signs of them
> being fixed in the near-term future, and no strong evidence of any
> deep harm caused by their presence).
VST has some advantages, but the licence situation is murky, its not
/that/ great and I don't think we gain a lot by following it.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 14 2002 - 17:30:06 EEST