Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Specs ?
From: Likai Liu (news_AT_likai.net)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 22:21:19 EEST
Dr. William Bland wrote:
>On Tue, 14 May 2002, Steve Harris wrote:
>
>>On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 04:19:39 -0400, Likai Liu wrote:
>>
>>>I think your point of keeping ladspa the way it is for beginning plugin
>>>writers, but to make extension as another pluging API that is back
>>>compatible with LADSPA is well made. Let's start LADNSSPA (linux audio
>>>developers not so simple plugin API). Maybe abbreviate it as L6A or
>>>something.
>>>
>>Something snappy/memorable/pronounceable would be good.
>>
>>TDM, DX, VST...
>>
>>- Steve
>>
>
>I like L6A.
>
>Just my tupence.
>Cheers,
> Bill.
>
hahah ... I was rather in a joking mood when I said L6A, which alludes
i18n or l10n. (i18n is internationalization, l10n is localization). but
i promise to think about the name more seriously. btw, I have not looked
at the JACK API yet. is anybody aware that we absolutely cannot use or
take advantage of the whole or parts of it?
liulk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue May 14 2002 - 22:17:33 EEST