Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA v1.1 Alternative Proposal
From: Tim Goetze (tim_AT_quitte.de)
Date: Mon May 27 2002 - 15:21:04 EEST
Steve Harris wrote:
>On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 01:45:04 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
>> ps: i'd also like to see LADSPA_PORT_CONTROL | LADSPA_PORT_AUDIO being
>> given official merit in <ladspa.h>.
>
>That changes the semantics of CONTROL and AUDIO it would be better to add
>a new hint which indicated that an audio rate control was intended for
>control data, but lets not pollute 1.1; 0dB = 1.0 and defualts are the
>important things.
ok, never mind.
so what do you think about the actual proposal? (*DataLocation =
default in connect_port)
tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon May 27 2002 - 15:24:48 EEST