Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] emagic (logic) drops VST support under OS X
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 02 2002 - 20:27:50 EEST


On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 06:22:33 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> i think that Jack and its quick adoption shows the potential is
> here, but i also think that o-o-p is a big performance burden in
> most cases (otoh i seem to have a faible for aged hardware ;).

I'm not to sure about the OOP comment. A few years ago I would have
agreed, but c++ compilers have got a lot better recently, and Apple's
reincarnation of objective-c might make that a viable platform.

I would say that most DSP code written today is in a OO style, whether it
is actually in a nativly OO language or not. DSP code, and especially
plugins do lend themselves very well to OO style programming.

AFAIK all VST plugins are written in c++.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Sep 02 2002 - 20:38:04 EEST