Re: [linux-audio-dev] meterbridge 0.0.4

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] meterbridge 0.0.4
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Oct 03 2002 - 14:03:32 EEST


On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:38:33 +0200, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
> > That is just becuase it tried to connect as brdige, and if it cant tries
> > bridge-<pid>
>
> ok, i could have thought of that myself....

Not that this is a good thing, it should be fixed. I didn´t check to see
if there was a client name query function. If so I will use that, if not I
will probably just move to always using bridge-<pid>. ¿comments?
 
> > Yeah, thats not fixable. Making them not crash is probably better.
> > I'd like to get to the bottom of your segfual problem. I though id
> > probably fixed it.
>
> just to clarify, i mean killall -TERM, not killall -KILL. out of
> curiousity, is there a way to tell the scheduler not to pre-empt the
> process until the port cleanup is completed ? (sorry if this is a dumb
> question, i don't know much about unix programming...)

Sig term (should) cause the cleanup handler to be called, nothing will
happen to the process other than that IIRC. ITs up to you what you do with
the signal, but its polite to exit afterwards ;)

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Oct 03 2002 - 14:23:47 EEST