Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] meterbridge 0.0.4
From: torben hohn (torbenh_AT_gmx.de)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 16:18:48 EEST
On 04 Oct 2002 10:21:13 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:55:25 +1000, Stoll, Jake wrote:
> > > that, if not I
> > > will probably just move to always using bridge-<pid>. ¿comments?
> >
> > The only thing I don't like about the <jack-client-name>-<pid> idea is when
> > you've got applications (ardour) that try to re-establish previous jack
> > connections it can't.
> >
> > I'm not sure that you'd want to do this with the meterbridge but it's
> > something that needs to be handled if we want to be able to save and restart
> > a "jack session".
>
> Well, there should be a standardised switch to jack clients that makes
> them use a given jack name, we´ve mentioned this before. I suggest
> --jack-name. votes¿
--jack-name is good.
libjack should be able to add its own commandline options through a
mechanism like gtk_init( argc, &argv );
>
> I dont like using pids because it looks messy, maybe jack could provice an
> eqivalent to tmpname (or whatever its called), so you could call
> jack_unique_name("bridge") and get back "bridge-1" the first time and
> "bridge-2" the second for example.
>
> - Steve
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 04 2002 - 16:33:34 EEST