Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 12:45:08 EET
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 04:02:07 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an
> > > instrument API must not support it?
> >
> > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
> > that LADSPA will still be simpler.
>
> yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
> ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.
Me too, not a very good name.
Your more immediate problem is making it easy for a LADSPA host to host
[insert name here] plugins. There are a lot of LADSPA hosts, and zero
[...] hosts.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Dec 08 2002 - 12:48:57 EET