Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)
From: Tim Hockin (thockin_AT_hockin.org)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 13:11:16 EET
> > Uggh, can we keep the get() of control values simpler than events? My
> > previos proposal had a control->get() method and a ctrl->set() method.
> > Obviously, the set() is superceded by events. Is the get, too?
>
> What is this for? If you want to implement this then they need to be
> events (well, sample accurate), but they sound like a pain to implement.
Well, my first thought is that we don;t want to send a CTRL_CHANGE event to
the host every time a control changes, Do we want the host to have to send
CTRL_GET events and wait for CTRL_VALUE events, or can we say 'one tick
granularity is all the host can get' wrt CTRL_GET?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Dec 08 2002 - 13:14:49 EET