Re: [linux-audio-dev] XAP status : incomplete draft

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] XAP status : incomplete draft
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 22:13:45 EET


On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:24:33 -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > Why the xap_ prefix on all the fields in the struct?
>
> Old habit - prefixing struct fields with soemthing to identify the struct.
> Makes it trivial to search for all uses of ->xap_label as opposed to ->label
> (which exists in several structs). If people REALLY hate it, I can let it
> go. I try to always do that in exported code.

I really hate it.
 
> What's missing? I thought about state() and decided this was complete. Did
> I miss something?

I think large numbers of states are overcomplicated myself.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Dec 13 2002 - 22:16:50 EET