Re: [linux-audio-dev] XAP: a polemic

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] XAP: a polemic
From: Paul Davis (paul_AT_linuxaudiosystems.com)
Date: Mon Dec 16 2002 - 04:06:29 EET


>> by definition, time isn't flowing when the transport is
>> stopped. a delay in stationary time can only be a zero
>
>umm, I know that a requirement for me is to be able to stop the sequencer,
>and still play MIDI and have delay lines etc still delay. Are you saying
>that this can't be done in your model? In my opinion just because transport
>has stopped does NOT mean time has stopped. On the contrary, ticks are
>still happening, the tempo is still in effect. Just because the SEQUENCER
>stopped sending events doesn't mean the rest of the studio did.

no, this is wrong. if the transport stops, depending on how you define
"the transport", then all *musical* time has stopped, at least all
musical time using the musical timebase controlled by "the transport".

--p


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Dec 16 2002 - 04:11:04 EET