Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] XAP: a polemic
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Dec 18 2002 - 15:46:40 EET
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:47:21 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 December 2002 11.16, Steve Harris wrote:
> [...]
> > I dont see any point in having anythign other than ramp, and
> > /maybe/ set, but it just seems like a ramp with a duration of 0 to
> > me.
>
> Yeah - but that's a special case on the receiving end. SET allows you
> to test for zero duration when sending events. (I've explained
> elsewhere why I think that's a good idea.)
OK, I'd have to construct an inner loop to see which was cleaner, but I
wont be happy with the API until I've tried coding against it anyway.
I think this is an open issue.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Dec 18 2002 - 15:48:55 EET