Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Sidechains, was Re: [linux-audio-announce] [ANN] swh-plugins 0.3.4

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Sidechains, was Re: [linux-audio-announce] [ANN] swh-plugins 0.3.4
From: Pascal Haakmat (a.haakmat_AT_chello.nl)
Date: Sat Jan 11 2003 - 06:12:54 EET

11/01/03 14:10, Conrad Parker wrote:

> (one bit LADSPA sidechain proposal below ;)

[sni]

> Now, how about if we add a SIDECHAIN flag to LADSPA_PortDescriptor (ie.
> appropriately use one of the 28 bits still available there):
>
> #define LADSPA_PORT_SIDECHAIN 0x10
>
> #define LADSPA_IS_PORT_SIDECHAIN(x) ((x) & LADSPA_PORT_SIDECHAIN)

[snip]

> I reckon this would give us what users expect, completely backwards
> compatible, without breaking existing plugins or hosts.
>
> Conrad.
> www.metadecks.org

Sounds good to me. Maybe I'd prefer a name like CONTINUOUS_CONTROL to
SIDECHAIN though (although that is also confusing because it applies
to an audio port). 

-- 
The GNOME U sound editor:
http://awacs.dhs.org/software/gnusound

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Jan 11 2003 - 06:13:24 EET