Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] PTAF link and comments
From: David Olofson (david@olofson.net)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 15:17:56 EET
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 14.00, Sami P Perttu wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, David Olofson wrote:
> > Anyway, the reason for not using Hz or similar in the API is that
> > such units are harder to deal with, pretty much no matter what
> > you want to do. The only exception is when you actually want to
> > have some periodic action driven by it, ie sound. Thus, rather
> > than using Hz in the API and having event processors and whatnot
> > convert back and forth, we use linear pitch (1.0/octave)
> > throughout, and leave it to the final stage; the synth, to
> > convert it into whatever drives it's
>
> Okay, that is some kind of answer. The needs of the event
> processors outweigh the needs of the audio processors.
Not quite. It's only a matter of *where* to perform the conversion. It
can never be avoided entirely. (Unless we assume that users will want
to paint events in piano rolls with Hz on the vertical scale, that
is. ;-)
> > oscillators. Which, mind you, is not necessarily Hz or
> > samples/period! It may well be coefficients for a resonant filter
> > you need.
>
> I guess you'd still convert them to linear frequency on the way.
Not if you're using an optimized approximation. That generally boils
down to a plain polynomial or similar function, translating whatever
you have directly into whatever you want.
> > As to actually doing the conversion, I suppose we could throw
> > some inline implementations into the plugin SDK.
>
> Yes, a control iterator would be nice: something that takes a pitch
> ramp event as input and then produces Hz values each sample as
> output.
Yeah, we can have all sorts of stuff like that. It's not really part
of the API, so it won't be as hard to "get stuff in" - although it's
obviously still a good idea to keep things nice and clean, and avoid
obvious redundancies. After all, an SDK isn't of much help if it
takes longer to find and/or understand what you need than it would
take to implement it on your own.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Feb 05 2003 - 15:28:00 EET