[linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] LADSPA Taxonomy

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [linux-audio-user] LADSPA Taxonomy
From: Jan \ (eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net)
Date: Sat Apr 05 2003 - 18:01:40 EEST


Looks good to me.

On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 08:44, Steve Harris wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After the LAD Conference and using apps which used the lrdf taxoomy
> (putting plugins into categories) code it became obvious the the current
> taxonomy wasn't really useful.
>
> the current taxnomy looks like:
>
> Utilities
> Generators
> Oscillators
> Simulators
> Reverbs
> Time
> Delays
> Phasers
> Flangers
> Chorus
> Reverbs
> Frequency
> Measurement
> Filters
> Lowpass
> Highpass
> Bandpass
> Combs
> Allpass
> EQs
> Parametric
> Multiband
> Pitch shifters
> Amplitude
> Amplifiers
> Waveshapers
> Modulators
> Distortions
> Dynamics
> Compressors
> Expanders
> Limiters
> Gates
>
> This makes a certian amount of sense from a theoretical point of view, but
> isn't much use when you're trying to find a compressor.
>
> So, we need to deine a taxonomy that is more useful to users.
>
> I recon that something like this is a good start, but feedback would
> really help:
>
> Utilities
>
> Generators
> Oscillators
>
> Delays
> Phasers + Allpass
> Flangers
> Chorus
>
> Reverbs
>
> Filters
> Lowpass
> Highpass
> Bandpass
> Combs
>
> EQs
> Parametric
> Multiband
>
> Pitch shifters
>
> Modulation
>
> Distortion
> Amp effects
> Waveshapers
>
> Dynamics
> Compressors
> Expanders
> Limiters
> Gates
>
> Feel free to suggest changes to make it easier to use. I can drop in the
> new taxonomy without changing any code. As soon as we decide on a new
> structure I will distribute a new .rdfs file then you can just copy it
> over the old one and try it out.
>
> - Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 18:30:07 EEST