Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Direct Stream Digital / Pulse Density Modulation musing/questions
From: Dustin Barlow (duslow_AT_hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Apr 23 2003 - 03:54:09 EEST
I read an interesting article on Direct Stream Digital (DSD) / Pulse Density
Modulation (PDM) entitled "A Better Mousetrap" by Brian Smithers in the May
2003 issue of Electronic Musician. Since, Brian did a good job explaining
PDM/DSD in quasi-layman terms, I'll just quote snippets from his article to
set the stage for my questions.
<quote a="EM: A Better Mousetrap" p="96">
In DSD, the amplitude of the waveform is represented by the relative density
of the ones and zeros within the bitstream; for that reason the technique
is also known as Pulse Density Modulation (PDM). A full positive waveform
results in all ones and, whereas a full negative waveform results in all
zeros. Silence would yield a string of alternating ones and zeros
(Alternating ones and zeros reflect the "neutral" density of silence.) Sony
claims a resulting dynamic range of 120db for DSD.
In the simplest terms, DSD compares the energy of a waveform at each sample
point to the accumulated energy of previous sample periods. If the energy
is higher, a value of 1 is recorded; if the energy is lower, a value of 0 is
recorded. Because the bitstream represents the change (delta) in energy
compared to the sum (sigma) of the previous energies, another name for this
technique is Sigma-Delta Modulation (SDM).
</quote>
The article goes on to explain how DSD uses a sampling rate of 2.8224 MHz
resulting in a frequency response that extends to 100kHz. The higher sample
rate can also improve stereo/surround imaging.
<quote a="EM: A Better Mousetrap" p="96">
One more justification for DSD is that the steep filters required for PCM to
conform to the Nyquist theorem can themselves degrade the sound due to their
sharp cutoff. In fact, it has become common for PCM analog-to-digital (A/D)
converters to start with a 1-bit conversion stage and then apply a digital
decimation filter to convert the bitstream to PCM format. DSD essentially
bypasses the decimation filter and stores the 1-bit data directly.
</quote>
DSD/PDM appears to be a superiour technique for recording and playing audio
material. Granted, this technology may never catch on because of all the
hardware and software changes that would be required to mirror what a
typical PCM based DAW currently does. But, if DSD/PDM does catch on, and
DAWs start being produced, how will this effect current audio DSP
techniques? How would JACK's current design be effected by a 1-bit stream
format?
The article mentions a program called Pyramix (Windows) which features DSD
support. However, for Pyramix to do EQ, dynamics, reverb processing, and to
display waveforms and vu levels, it converts DSD to a "high quality" PCM
format.
I suspect that if DSD/PDM has any hope of succeeding in the current DAW
world, there will have to be some real-time lossless converter constructed
to seemlessly bridge the formats. But that of course begs the question of
why use DSD in the first place if you just are forced to "decimate" it PCM
to process it?
Sony is currently using DSD/PDM in their SACD format, and are positioning
themselves to be the competing format to PCM based DVD-A. The fact that
something like this shows up in EM means that at some level the format is
being given some credence and is being watched by others then just the
audiophile recording crowd.
Is DSD/PDM just a flash in the pan, or does it really represent a new wave
of thinking regarding storing/processing audio data?
Dustin
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Apr 23 2003 - 04:04:37 EEST