Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL and real-time sched semantics
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 30 2003 - 11:28:50 EEST
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 06:20:34 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> what would be *really* bad is if they actually changed the code so
> that attempts to set SCHED_FIFO are not honored because they believe
> they are useless. i don't know which of these is true.
My main dev machien is RH9 and I haven't noticed any problems, OTOH it has
a lousy soundcard (block size of 1024 min), so it might he harder to spot.
There are plenty of peopel running RH9 here, and people like to complain
abut thier latency performance ;) I guess it could be subtle though.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri May 30 2003 - 11:36:20 EEST