Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Shared memory
From: Jussi Laako (jussi.laako_AT_pp.inet.fi)
Date: Sun Jul 13 2003 - 15:13:40 EEST
On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 22:32, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> For some reason the shared memory is not a true shared memory.
> The shmserver and shmclient do have the shared memory segment
> obtained with the same shmid value, but processes seems to
> have their own duplicates of it. I have no other explanation.
I haven't got any problems with shared memory, but afterall, I don't use
the SystemV method (shm* functions) because it sucks. I think the
SystemV IPC stuff sucks as whole. I like to use the "real" POSIX way..
:)
-- Jussi Laako <jussi.laako_AT_pp.inet.fi>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Jul 13 2003 - 15:19:33 EEST