Re: [OT] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux 2.6 not a latency panacea?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux 2.6 not a latency panacea?
From: Robert Jonsson (robert.jonsson_AT_dataductus.se)
Date: Mon Aug 18 2003 - 23:36:07 EEST


Friday 15 August 2003 21:14 skrev Ingo Oeser:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:02:21PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> [kernel scheduler tunables]
>
> > i guess it would be relatively easy to replace the above with
> > variables controlled via sysctl.
>
> It is. There is even a patch for that. Google for kernel
> scheduler tunables patch.

Hi,

I think this was a reply to my query about selectable schedulers.

Though cool to change these things in realtime, tuning wasn't exactly what I
was after.

I was under the impression that there was now several different
task-schedulers in the kernel (the O(1) scheduler being one), but I'm
guessing by the answers that this was not correct.

/Robert


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 00:00:44 EEST