RE: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa diff

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: RE: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa diff
From: Richard Furse (rf015d9821_AT_blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 21:27:33 EEST

Well, I'm *half* paying attention...

So we're essentially saying that the momentary thing is a trigger that
operates on 0->positive but not positive->0. I must admit I'm not 100% clear
about the randomisable case from the text.

Do we have example plugins for the two cases?

Cheers,

--Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-audio-dev-admin_AT_music.columbia.edu
[mailto:linux-audio-dev-admin_AT_music.columbia.edu]On Behalf Of Steve
Harris
Sent: 09 September 2003 08:47
To: linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa diff

On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:54:17 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> lets just do it. i think that personally steve harris should be the
> final arbiter of this stuff, after consulting with this list. he's
> done more with LADSPA than almost anyone else (perhaps than anyone
> else). we've discussed these changes for a while, and IIRC nobody had
> any objections.

I'd rather have someone else make the final decision though, for various
reasons - spreading the blame if nothing else :)

Can someone mail Richard off-list? I'm going to be away from email til the
weekend.

- Steve

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Sep 12 2003 - 07:16:42 EEST