[linux-audio-dev] some more GMPI thoughts

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [linux-audio-dev] some more GMPI thoughts
From: horsh (horsh_AT_mail.ru)
Date: Tue Oct 21 2003 - 17:43:14 EEST

1)is API monolithous or there are sub-APIs
like GMPI-audio, GMPI-seq, GMPI-control

2) Explicit versioning for API?

3) Explicit versioning for plugins?

4) uniq IDs for plugins?
   who is authority?

5) format for plugin state saving:
    XML? (damn its ugly!)
   I vote for more YAML-like language.

6) Should the GMPI discussion produce
    reference plugin implementation
    reference host implementation
    reference tools implementation

7) Can there be off-line non real-time plugins?

8) Should the specification produce
   any requirement for more documents?
For example:
A documant describing standard set of plugins
   (like in General Midi) so one could expect
    the first 64 plugins to be so and so.

horsh

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Oct 21 2003 - 17:29:55 EEST