Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] drivel
From: Paul Winkler (pw_lists_AT_slinkp.com)
Date: Tue Oct 21 2003 - 23:34:21 EEST
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:23:07PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >The latter. If you read the whole thing, it's pretty clear even from that
> >link that "tailored to fit the needs of the Digidesign end user"
> >means nothing more than "it's a versatile microphone".
>
> more than that, it probably means "its not a particularly good
> microphone for anything in particular, but you might like it because
> its not particular bad either and it comes in the box".
Actually given BLUE's reputation I suspect it's an excellent mic.
There are plenty of good versatile microphones. Think how many things a
U47 has been successfully pointed at, or an RCA-77, or a Sennheiser 421,
or an EV RE-20, or even an SM-57, or (insert your favorite small-diaphragm
condenser). And all of those have particular jobs that they excel at.
But I don't for a second believe that this mic has any special
affinity with Digi hardware. This is pure marketing and packaging
for both companies.
--Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.com Look! Up in the sky! It's FUZZY SPECTACULAR ENGINEER! (random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Oct 21 2003 - 23:42:03 EEST