Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Demolition results, attention LADSPA developers
From: Mike Rawes (mike_rawes_AT_yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Sun Nov 16 2003 - 13:30:36 EET
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:30:17 +0000
Nick Lamb <njl98r_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Here are my latest test results from running Demolition
> http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~njl98r/code/ladspa/demolition.html
>
> 237 plugins were tested from 117 plug-in libraries, including all the
> ones in BLOP, CMT, SWH, MCP and REV.
>
> I'm disappointed to see that demolition has not been used to improve
> the quality of LADSPA plugins. This post is a metaphorical stick,
> since the carrot has not worked. If you see a plugin you like here,
> make sure the maintainer fixes it.
>
> So without further ado here are the error reports.
[...]
> ERROR: port 0 is LOGARITHMIC but LowerBound isn't positive
Is this really an error? Dealing with the aymptote is trivial, and needs
to be done anyway if a host allows the user to change the range hints.
-
Myk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Nov 16 2003 - 13:31:57 EET