Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] JACK tutorial
From: Paul Brossier (piem-lists_AT_altern.org)
Date: Mon Nov 17 2003 - 06:12:24 EET
Thanks for this tut.
Just one thought : the include statements in your code snipnets do not appear
correctly because of the <>. You could pass them through vim to take care of
the html characters (and add some color :).
$ vim +f +"syntax on" +"so $VIMRUNTIME/syntax/2html.vim" +"wq" +"q" *.c
cheers, piem
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 14:56, james_AT_dis-dot-dat.net wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct, 2003 at 01:19PM +0200, Mathias Lundgren spake thus:
> > Great, great, great! Thanks a lot! IMHO, documentation like this one is
> > definitely needed and something we're currently lacking. I've only
> > skimmed it, but I'm going to read it more thoroughly later on, since it's
> > stuff I need to read up on.
> >
> > That said, I'm a newbie on the subject, but I guess that makes me part of
> > the targeted audience for the tutorial. I think you're explaining things
> > very well. Of course, one can always look through code and find out what
> > is going on when learning about things like these, but it's much better
> > to also get the general idea of things before looking through the code.
> > You're explaining both concepts and give examples, and do both very well.
> > Good job!
>
> Thanks for the comments. Let me know if you have any suggestions for
> improvement.
>
> > /Mathias
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I've recently been learning to use JACK, and I had a look around for
> > > some kind of introductory article. I couldn't find one, so I wrote
> > > the tutorial I would have wanted, as I learnt.
> > >
> > > The tutorial is here:
> > > http://dis-dot-dat.net/jacktuts/starting/index.html
> > >
> > > Please have a look, make suggestions. Flames are fine, too. Let me
> > > know if I've made some huge error. Or maybe I'm not doing things
> > > the best way? Whatever, let me know.
> > >
> > > If this is well received, I'll write about more advanced topics as I
> > > get to them - mixing, the transport, threading without blocking the
> > > process callback, etc.
> > >
> > > I'll probably be asking a lot of questions later on, especially
> > > about best practise.
> > >
> > > Thanks peeps,
> > >
> > > James
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Nov 17 2003 - 06:11:12 EET