Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Jack Callbacks
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:10:05 EET
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:28:56 +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> > I did notice that the graph_order_callback was being called, but the
> > process of trying to figure out if a port has actually disappeared (or
> > something has just been connected) is both really gross and really
> > inefficient.
>
> Having looked at it some more I dont think it is a bug - I dont think a
> client dosconnecting completely counts as deregistering.
>
> Wether it should or not I dont know. I'm doing some more testing.
If you apply the patch at the end of this mail I think it should turn it
on, but I cant test it for various reasons.
- Steve
--- jackd/engine.c 13 Jan 2004 15:11:27 -0000 1.80
+++ jackd/engine.c 31 Jan 2004 01:07:26 -0000
@@ -1503,6 +1503,7 @@
for (node = client->ports; node; node = jack_slist_next (node)) {
port = (jack_port_internal_t *) node->data;
jack_port_clear_connections (engine, port);
+ jack_port_registration_notify (engine, port->shared->id, FALSE);
jack_port_release (engine, port);
}
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Jan 31 2004 - 03:12:36 EET