Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] DRI + Jack conflict?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Feb 14 2004 - 00:50:14 EET


On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 07:48:18 +0100, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Steve Harris]
>
> >> i do agree that GL is a potentially important optimization. i don't
> >> expect the potential to manifest itself within the next cople of years
> >> though. :)
> >
> >Right, well in the meantime im doing it as optional - eg. I have an alpha
> >version of meterbridge which can use GL - if you have it, it's massivly
> >more efficient, it looks better and you can resize the windows.
>
> i think you're doing the right thing to offer this as an alternative,
> but i must confess i don't envy your position as code maintainer. :)

I only did it because I had the SDL code allready, the GL code is much
cleaner and easier to follow. Hopefully the SDL code can be deprecated
over the next couple of years.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Feb 14 2004 - 00:50:33 EET